Why Iā€™m joining IDAGIOā€Š ā€” ā€Ša classical music startup ā€” and moving to Berlin

Today Iā€™m excited to announce that Iā€™m joining IDAGIO, a streaming service for classical music lovers, as Director of Product. Iā€™m already in the process of relocating to Berlin, where Iā€™ll be joining the team later this month.

In this post, I want to explain why I so strongly believe in this niche focused music service and IDAGIOā€™s mission. I also want to shed light on the future of MUSIC x TECH x FUTURE as a newsletter, a type of media, and an agency. (tl;dr: the newsletter lives on!)

Two months ago,Ā a friend whom I had worked with in Moscow, at music streaming service Zvooq, forwarded me a vacancy as a Twitter DM. By then, I had developed a kind of mental auto-ignore, because friends kept sending me junior level vacancies in music companies. I was never looking for a ā€˜jobā€™ā€Šā€”ā€ŠI had a job (but thanks for thinking of me ā¤ļø). However, I trusted that this friend knew me better as a professional, so I opened the link.

I was immediately intrigued. I hadnā€™t heard of IDAGIO before, but Iā€™ve spent a lot of time thinking about niche services. At one point, the plan for Zvooq was to not build a typical one-size-fits-all app like all the other music streaming services are doing, but instead it would be to split different types of music-related behaviours into smaller apps. The goal would then become to monopolize those behaviours: like Google has monopolized search behaviour (now called Googling), and Shazam has monopolized Shazaming. Long term, it would allow us to expand that ecosystem of apps beyond streaming content, so we would be able to monetize behaviours with higher margins than behaviours related to music listening.

We ended up building just one, Fonoteka, before we had to switch strategies due to a mix of market reality, licensing terms, and burn rate. That was fine: it was what the business needed, and what Russia as a market needed.

Since then, there have been a number of niche music ideas, like services for indie rock, high quality streaming, etc. And while those are all commendable, I was never quite interested in them, because it just seemed like those services would not have a strong enough strategic competitive advantage in the face of tech giants with bulging coffers. Their offers were often also just marginally better, but getting people to install an app and build a habit around your service, unlearn their old solution, learn to do it your wayā€¦ thatā€™s a huge thing to ask of people, especially once you need to go beyond the super early adopters.

But niche works on a local level. You can see it with Yandex.Music and Zvooq in Russia, with Anghami in the Middle East, and Gaana in India.

Over the last decade, Iā€™ve lived in Russia, Bulgaria, Turkey, and The Netherlands (where Iā€™m from). Each country has unique ways of interacting with music. Music has a different place in each culture. I think local music services work, because they combine catalogues and local taste with a deep understanding of how their target audience connects to music. It allows them to build something catering exactly to those behaviours. Itā€™s music and behaviour combined.

When I started talking to the IDAGIO team, I soon understood that they too combine these elements. Classical music, in all its shapes and forms, has many peculiarities, which will remain an object of study for me for the next years. The fact that the same work often has a multitude of recordings by different performers already sets it apart. One can map a lot of behaviours around navigation, exploring, and comparison to just this one fact.

An example of one way in which IDAGIO lets people explore various performances of the same work.

Despite being younger and having more modest funding, IDAGIO has already built a product that caters better to classical music fans than the other streaming services do (and also serves lossless streams). Understanding that, I was fast convinced that this was something I seriously needed to consider.

So I got on a plane and met the team. Over the course of three days, we ran a condensed design sprint, isolated a problem we wanted to tackle together, interviewed expert team members, explored options, drew up solutions, and prototyped a demo to test with the target audience. Itā€™s an intense exercise, especially when youā€™re also being sized up as a potential team member, but the team did such a good job at making me feel welcome and at home (ā¤ļø). Through our conversations, lunches, and collaboration, I was impressed with the teamā€™s intelligence, creativity, and general thoughtfulness.

Then I spent some extra time in Berlinā€Šā€”ā€Šafter all, Iā€™d be moving there. Aforementioned friend took me to a medical museum with a room full of glass cabinets containing jars with contents which will give me nightmares for years to come. Besides that, I met a bunch of other friends, music tech professionals, and entrepreneurs, who collectively convinced me of the high caliber of talent and creative inspiration in the city.

Returning home, I made a decision I didnā€™t expect to make this year, nor in the years to come. A decision to make a radical switch in priorities.

Motivation, for me, comes from the capacity to grow and to do things with meaningful impact. MUSIC x TECH x FUTURE has exposed me to a lot of different people, a lot of different problems, and has allowed me to do what I find interesting, what Iā€™m good at, but also what I grow and learn from. With IDAGIO I can do all of the latter, but with depth, and with a team.

Classical music online has been sidelined a bit. It makes a lot of sense when you place it in a historical perspective: a lot has changed in recent years. The webā€™s demographic skews older now. You can notice this by counting the number of family members on Facebook. The internet used to be something most adults would just use for work, so if you were building entertainment services, you target the young, early adopter demographic. Thatā€™s pop music, rock, electronic, hiphop, etc. Classical was there, sure, but Spotify wasnā€™t designed around it, iTunes wasnā€™t, YouTube wasnā€™t.

Now weā€™re actually reaching a new phase for music online. The streaming foundation has been built. Streaming is going mainstream. The platforms from the 2007ā€“2009 wave are maturing and looking beyond their original early adopter audiencesā€¦ So weā€™re going to see a lot of early adopters that are not properly served anymore. Theyā€™re going to migrate, look for new homes. A very important segment there, one that has always been underserved, are classical music fans. And now, this niche audience is sizeable enough to actually build a service around.

Why? Well, the internet has changed since the large last wave of music startups. Mobile is becoming the default way people connect to the web. For adults, this has made the web less of a thing for ā€˜workā€™, and has made entertainment more accessible. Connected environments make it easy to send your mobile audio to your home hifi set, or car speakers. The amount of people on the internet has more than doubled.

This makes the niche play so much more viable than just a few years ago. It has to be done with love, care, and a very good understanding of whose problem youā€™re trying to solve (and what that problem is). IDAGIO has exactly the right brilliant minds in place to pull this off and Iā€™m flattered that in 2 weeks time, Iā€™ll get to spend 2,000 hours a year with them.

What happens to theĀ agency?

Iā€™ll be winding down the agency side of MxTxF. This means Iā€™m not taking on any more clients, but Iā€™m happy to refer you to great people I know. Some longer term projects, that just take a couple of hours per week, Iā€™ll keep on to bring to completion.

What happens to the newsletter?

The newsletter goes on! I get a lot of personal fulfilment out of it. The agency was born out of the newsletter, so who knows what more it will spawn. Iā€™m actually figuring out a way to add audio and video content to the mix. I expect Midem and SĆ³nar+D next June will be pilots for that. Berlin is a great place for music tech, so if anything, I hope the newsletter will only get more interesting as time goes on.

Besides the personal fulfilment, it allows me to be in touch with this wonderful community, to meet fascinating people, and occasionally to help organise a panel and bring some of my favourite minds into the same room at the same time.

If youā€™d like to support the newsletter, you can help me out on Patreon. You can become a patron of the newsletterā€Šā€”ā€Šwith your support, I can add extra resources to the newsletter, which will let me push the content to the next level (high on the list: a decent camera).

Elgar making an early recording of the work in 1920. Those pipes are acoustic recording horns, which were piped to a diaphragm which would vibrate a cutting stylusā€Šā€”ā€Šdirectly turning sound waves into a material recording.

I leave you with Edward Elgarā€™s Cello Concerto in E Minor, Op. 85, which I discovered as a student, listening to the brilliant SzamĆ”r MadĆ”r by Venetian Snares in which it is sampled.

ā–¶ļø Cello Concerto in E Minor, Op.Ā 85

You can listen to the work, in full, on IDAGIO.

Iā€™d love to hear about your favourite works and recordings. Feel free to email me on bg@idagio.com, with a link, and tell me what I should listen for.

Mood augmentation and non static music

Why the next big innovation in music will change music itselfā€Šā€”ā€Šand how our moods are in the driverā€™s seat for that development.

Over the last half year, Iā€™ve had the pleasure to publish two guest contributions in MUSIC x TECH x FUTURE about our changing relationship with music.

The first had Thiago R. Pinto pointing out how weā€™re now using music to augment our experiences and that we have developed a utilitarian relation with regards to music.

Then last week, James Lynden shared his research into how Spotify affects mood and found out that people are mood-aware when they make choices on the service (emphasis mine):

Overall, mood is a vital aspect of participantsā€™ behaviour on Spotify, and it seems that participants listen to music through the platform to manage or at least react to their moods. Yet the role of mood is normally implicit and unconscious in the participantsā€™ listening.

Having developed music streaming products myself, like Fonoteka, when I was at Zvooq, Iā€™m obviously very interested in this topic and what it means for the way we structure music experiences.

Another topic I love to think about is artificial intelligence, generative music, as well as adaptive and interactive music experiences. Particularly, Iā€™m interested at how non-static music experiences can be brought to a mass market. So when I saw the following finding (emphasis mine), things instantly clicked:

In the same way as we outsource some of our cognitive load to the computer (e.g. notes and reminders, calculators etc.) perhaps some of our emotional state could also be seen as being outsourced to the machine.

For the music industry, I think explicitly mood-based listening is an interesting, emerging consumption dynamic.

Mood augmentation is the best way for non-static music to reach a massĀ market

James is spot-on when he says mood-based listening is an emerging consumption dynamic. Taking a wider view: the way services construct music experiences also changes the way music is made.

The playlist economy is leading to longer albums, but also optimization of tracks to have lower skip rates in the first 30 seconds. This is nothing compared to the change music went through in the 20th century:

The proliferation of the record as the default way to listen to music meant that music became a consumer product. Something you could collect, like comic books, and something that could be manufactured at a steady flow. This reality gave music new characteristics:

  • Music became static by default: a song sounding exactly the same as all the times youā€™ve heard it before is a relatively new quality.
  • Music became a receiving experience: music lost its default participative quality. If you wanted to hear your favourite song, you better be able to play it, or a friend or family member better have a nice voice.
  • Music became increasingly individual: while communal experiences, like concerts, raves and festivals flourished, music also went through individualization. People listen to music from their own devices, often through their headphones.

Personalized music is the nextĀ step

I like my favourite artist for different reasons than my friend does. I connect to it differently. I listen to it at different moments. Our experience is already different, so why should the music not be more personalized?

Iā€™ve argued before that features are more interesting to monetize than pure access to content. $10 per month for all the music in the world: and then?

The gaming industry has figured out a different model: give people experience to the base game for free, and then charge them to unlock certain features. Examples of music apps that do this are Bjorkā€™s Biophilia as well as mixing app Pacemaker.

In the streaming landscape, TIDAL has recently given users a way to change the length and tempo of tracks. Iā€™m surprised that it wasnā€™t Spotify, since they have The Echo Nest team aboard, including Paul Lamere who built who built the Infinite Jukebox (among many other great music hacks).

But itā€™s early days. And the real challenge in creating these experiences is that listeners donā€™t know theyā€™re interested in them. As quoted earlier from James Lynden:

The role of mood is normally implicit and unconscious in the participantsā€™ listening.

The most successful apps for generative music and soundscapes so far, have been apps that generate sound to help you meditate or focus.

But as we seek to augment our human experience through nootropics and the implementation of technology to improve our senses, itā€™s clear that music as a static format no longer has to be default.

Further reading:Ā Moving Beyond the Static Music Experience.